6

How do we grow the site?

For example, for one question I emailed John Donaldson (USA Zone President in FIDE) a link to the question, "Which is the World's largest chess club?" -- but he decided to reply via email, than post an answer himself; which is fine, it's awesome he replied so fast to a random email.

Other option might be creating social media accounts that are under the communities control, since for example this Twitter account for Chess.SE appears to just auto-post question based on factors that are unknown; though honestly doesn't matter how they're posted since no human is actively engaging users via the account.

Any suggestions?

UPDATE: Not sure what to make of the lack of comments. Anyone have any comments on the topic?

UPDATE 2: If you have an idea/suggestion, please post one idea/suggestion per answer, not a group of them within one answer. Doing so will allow the community to better express their support of a given idea.

| |
  • I wish I knew... – Daniel May 23 '12 at 15:48
  • @Daniel δ: Thanks for the comment! So, not "knowing is half the battle". ;) I'm not really able to think of anything either, or at least that I know would likely make a difference. For now, I don't believe it is an big issue, but longer term it will be an issue. Also, if it matters, I've previously made an attempt to get another SE community to work together to grow the site, and nothing to my knowledge ever happen; which is to say most users have no solid idea of what to do. – blunders May 23 '12 at 16:12
3

Finding other chess related questions/answers/comments (and the related users) -- and engage the users in a meaningful way, possibly pointing them to the new Chess.SE site.

Here's one way to find chess related SE content on other SE sites.

| |
  • 1
    +1: In fact, I just posted a comment referring the OP of a chess question on BCG to this site. tttppp seemed a likely candidate, since s/he has no small amount of rep on BCG and this chess question was asked only three months ago. – Daniel May 23 '12 at 16:40
  • +1 @Daniel δ: Great, and agree tttppp would likely value getting a ping about Chess.SE, though I would be careful about just posting comments that might just appear to be advertisements; meaning it's best to combine it with a meaningful answers and/or comment. Other thing, with might not be obvious, but it's always a good idea to confirm the user being engaged does not already have an account on Chess.SE via their network profile; for examples, here's ttppp. Cheers! – blunders May 23 '12 at 17:02
  • Yep, checked that before I commented. But I take your point about "advertising". One reason I wouldn't be too worried about it in cases like this is that tttppp seems already interested in chess. If I wasn't so sure about that aspect, I would probably be more careful to give the invite some greater intrinsic appeal. – Daniel May 23 '12 at 18:28
  • @Daniel δ: Yes, I know, and agree -- just basing this off of responses I've gotten researching the topic on SO-Meta in the past, though that's SO. Really in the end depends on the user and the SE posted to I believe. I've used a similar approach to engage existing dormant users with great success; also note that oddly the community thought this was a bad idea too. – blunders May 23 '12 at 19:18

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .