@ETD, @Andrew, @Daniel and others:

Having visited your site a couple of times a month for years, I am not a heavy user; but, apparently, I like the site. I do not know which of you originally organized the site, but you and your friends have maintained it a long time. Thanks.

I am idly curious, though. To what degree does the site resemble your original vision for it?

If you can remember that far back.


4 years ago... For me, it closely resembles my vision. The amount of traffic isn't high, but my hope for the site was simple. The Stack Exchange model is a benefit to any topic, and there isn't any other system of site that meets the standards of efficiency and usefulness that this system does.


I think everyone should be reasonably happy that the site kinda survived, and serves a purpose for some members of the greater chess community, and for some specific topics. I thought the SE model would be both enabling and restrictive, and the results seem to be consistent. It is not a critical piece of the puzzle as far as chess sites go, but maybe this is for the best.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .